Christian Education:
Are We Cultivating the Wrong Tree?
Murray Brown
When Adam and Eve stood in Eden they were in serious need
of a Christian Education Programme. The future of the human
race depended on their becoming established in the faith, yet
they had no parents to raise them or church to instruct them.
Still, God had seemingly made provision for
their education through the existence of a grand tree in the
midst of the Garden: the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and
Evil.
At first glance this resource is one that
many of us would like access to in our homes, churches and
Bible Colleges. We would plant it in the backyard or position
it indoors in a prominent place - perhaps alongside the pulpit
or the professor’s lectern.
Yet this resource that so clearly educates
the student in the rights and wrongs of life and ministry poses
the greatest threat possible to the successful development
of Christians and leaders of the next generation. It must be
rooted out of our homes and places of learning and replaced
with the resource that God truly did provide for His children:
an intimate relationship with Him leading to fruit from the
Tree of Life.
Let us examine four characteristics of Christian
education according to the Tree of Life and contrast them with
the characteristics of Christian education found beneath the
other tree.
1. True Christian Education takes place in the context of principles rather
than precepts
To often we are concerned with raising our
children (and pastors?) with an understanding of what they
must do.
“Do this...” and “Don’t do that...”,
are our frequent instructions to our children that eventually
end up in a multi volume document too weighty for them to carry
through life. Consequently they ditch it in favour of the lightweight
paperback entitled “If It Feels Good Do It”.
Yet to educate according to the Tree of Life means that we
help them to construct a grid through which they filter all
the many ethical and moral decisions that await them in life.
To do this our target becomes the child’s heart, not
their behaviour. We instruct their heart by helping them to
understand the reasons why an action is unacceptable. When
a child is caught doing wrong, instead of being told “It’s
wrong, don’t do it!”, they must be asked to identify
why the action is wrong. If they don’t know they must
be helped to understand the moral principle that governs the
action.
To put it another way, rather than telling them which of
the Ten Commandments they have broken, develop in your children
an ability to understand how their action contravenes either
(or both) of the two great principles that govern Christian
life and conduct: to love God and to love others.
To not do so will produce young people who either abandon
a faith of “thou shalt not’s” or (worse perhaps),
pharisaic young Christians who are whitewashed tombs on the
outside but full of spiritual death on the inside.
2. True Christian Education takes place in the context of “being” rather
than “doing”
Implicit in Christian Education according to the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil, is the emphasis on getting
people to do the right thing, rather than to be the right person.
When we focus more on conduct than on character and more on
actions than on attitudes we risk developing the outer person
at the expense of the inner.
In theological terms, we put our efforts into cleaning up
the flesh rather than crucifying it and learning to live according
to the Spirit.
Not only does this have implications for our home life, it
challenges the way we think about Christian education in the
church.
If, when we speak of our Christian education programme, we
have in mind a curriculum of information that must be taught
to our young people, we are in serious trouble. Christian education
is not a curriculum of information but a programme of formation.
Information can be imparted in 45 minutes but formation requires
an investment of time throughout the week.
Therefore it succeeds best when it involves the parents,
who consistently role model and reinforce the information taught
throughout the week as they spend time with their children,
and as far as possible, with their children’s friends.
Even our institutes of training and education must reflect
on this emphasis. Are we creating institutions that fill people
with knowledge without regard for character? Are we more concerned
with having them sit in a group and listen to a lecture than
we are with sitting down with them one to one and reflecting
together on issues related to their personal growth and development?
Are we more concerned with assignments than with accountability?
Are we more concerned with creating people who can do ministry
than we are with creating people who can be ministers?
3. True Christian education takes place within the context of obedience
We live immersed in a culture that values knowledge accumulated
through study and equates it with leadership and authority.
The challenge for the church is to create a culture that values
wisdom accumulated through obedience and equates it with leadership
and maturity.
To do this our Christian education must carry with it an
expectation of application. When something is taught, whether
it be in the home or in a church setting, it must be followed
up with some form of accountability or the one being taught
will take the easy road of knowledge accumulation.
Although our education system is changing, much of what our
young people learn at school is done so in a context that values
memorisation and the absorption of knowledge that makes no
moral demands upon the hearer. Is it any wonder then that Bible
study for many is simply another intellectual exercise that
encourages knowledge accumulation.
Our Bible studies must encourage participants to find at
least one point of application and will provide accountability
amongst group members in the following weeks.
Our Bible Colleges must provide frequent opportunities to
implement what has been taught and to evaluate the student’s
performance. Through obedience, true knowledge infused with
spiritual life will flourish.
4. True Christian education takes place within the context of community
The family unit provides the best opportunity we have to
experience Christian education. Any parent knows that lessons
of sharing and caring are best taught to a toddler by introducing
a sibling into the family! They know too that lessons of respect
and obedience cannot be taught to a teenager as theory. They
must be learnt in the context of reality.
In the context of this community we learn the lessons of
life as we endeavour to live in close quarters with people
whose preferences and personalities differ from ours. Here
character and godliness can be learnt within the context of
life.
The second best opportunity we have to experience Christian
education is in the context of the church. Here we must rethink
our programmes so that we move from passive learning to active
learning.
Active learning involves more than the interchange of ideas
and perspectives. It involves having participants experience
the joys and frustrations of spending time together. We do
not learn to love by reading a textbook or by listening to
a sermon. Love is learnt when we spend time with the people
we do not like.
In the same way our theological courses and programmes must
be conducted within the context of community if they are to
avoid simply becoming places where the knowledge of good and
evil may be obtained. Issues of interpersonal disharmony among
students becomes the real lessons from which future leaders
are made.
A community where true Christian love and Life exist provides
the best environment where issues of life and faith can be
safely explored and settled upon.
Today, young people stand in serious need of a Christian
Education programme. The future of the church (not to mention
the human race) depends on these leaders of tomorrow becoming
established in the faith. As parents and church leaders we
have the awesome responsibility of providing instruction and
imparting faith.
Which tree will we cultivate?
- Murray Brown is the Director of YouthTRAIN
|